In "The Love Song of J.
Alfred Prufrock." the fog is metaphor for something deeper than he saw fog
and it was yellow. But going off of what was said by Mr. Preston and Alyssa i
agree that there was an artificial nature behind the fog. I also found it
interesting that the poem deals with fear and how time was slipping because
from my own synesthetic stand point yellow usually represents fear as an
emotion. So I think it would make since within the poems context because it
also deals with his fears of growing older and not living up to his full
potential and then rationalizing to himself that there will be more time later.
Friday, December 12, 2014
Hamlet Essay
“Though this be madness,
yet there is method in't” I chose this quote because I think it wraps the whole
play and defines all of Hamlet’s actions throughout the poem in one efficient sentence.
By dissecting this we see that Polonius is starting to realize that Hamlet’s
more of a tactical genius than a madmen but Polonius still considers him to be
mad because he still doesn’t understand the scope of what Hamlet has set into
action. Polonius said this line to himself but this does affect how he
interacts with Hamlet in future scenes and the actions he takes to try and learn
more information about what Hamlet is really planning, and then enrolling the
help of others with his vague assumptions. This is what I think is one of
Hamlet’s tactics in play, he knows how intelligent Polonius is and clouds his
words in enough metaphor that he would understand to a degree and then want
more information, Hamlet was always counting on Polonius to go tattle to
someone that had authority over Hamlet as a way to set Claudius off of his
balance and give himself the upper hand. This line was spoken at a time in the
play when others were still suspicious of Hamlet and what his true motives were
so this parcel of suspicion seems larger than it really is because everyone is
watching him so closely and that’s exactly what he wanted.
Polonius is used more as a messenger
than anything else through the play, his personality help this progress the
play by always confiding in authority figures and wanting some form of
recognition for his actions leading him to keep delivering them regardless of
any actual reward. Almost as if he’s the castle intern and all of Hamlets vague
words are the coffees the higher ups are always demanding.
The quote defines Hamlet because
despite how much calculation and thought he puts into all of his actions and
his words and who he says them to and how, he is considered mad by the other
characters. This shows two things, first is that Hamlet is extremely intelligent
and the other characters don’t begin to recognize his level of intelligence
until most of his plans have been in play for some time and the momentum of
them is too great to be stopped, and second is this demonstrates how much control
has over himself and his own emotions he has. Hamlets is able to contain the
raw emotion he harbors towards the murderer of his father and instead of attack
him and get the deed over with he chooses to do it in a way that will make
Claudius expose himself. He takes all that emotional energy festering inside of
him and mines it directing it to help him reach his goal. He uses his control
over his emotion and self to manipulate others into thinking what he needs them
to think in order for the next part of his plan to unfold. Hamlet’s actions are
totally based off of madness, pure unbridled madness, he’s going mad his father
was murdered and his mother is sleeping with the murderer, his friends are
turning on him and he’s alone. But what makes this play different from some
messed up revenge scheme is Hamlet cages all that madness just beneath all his
actions and words, only letting it peak when its beneficial to his ultimate
goal and this is the method the method of controlling yourself and your own
emotions so that you may change the reality around yourself.
Intro to Poetry
So for the
poetry it said maybe to write some poetry and I haven’t written poetry in a
little over 6 months according to my last poems date but I do have a bunch of
poems written already so I chose two that I thought related to the course and
how we talk about everything being a remix and our impact that we have on the
world, I’d like to note that I think it’s funny that these poems were written
about this time last year and covered very similar topics. Also they’re in more
of a stream of conscious style because I usually find that relying on rhyme
scheme can be limiting at times.
“How many original
thoughts does my mind contain? I’m sure others throughout time and the stretch
of reality have shared my thoughts. Do I even have one? Is my consciousness a
mirror, am I holding stained reflections of others thoughts? A tally of all my
originals would be convenient. So that I could know what direction my mind is
racing towards in claiming its own frequency, how many mental copyrights have I
broken?”
“What
moments does my future solidify, is the future as water, my will a pebble, ripples
the pebble at the epicenter, never seeing the ripples only water filling the
impact, sinking further, how many ripples were there, how long did they last,
were there any at all, these will be the last wonders, only to repeat and be
washed ashore, anticipating until I meet the waters boundary between my action
and its outcome, to have the same effect and wonder.”
Now I posted
these not because I think they’re necessarily good, in fact I see how much I’ve
grown as a writer that these make my eyes itch. But the point was to show
parallels between the course and works I’ve previously written, I think these show
that we may have thought of these same concepts before this class but we were
never given the materials or time to take them to such depth.
Poetry Remix
For
our groups collaborative poetry remix/jigsaw puzzle we chose the poem “Working Together” by David Whyte. So the whole point of our groups’
giant cardboard jigsaw puzzle was to highlight the theme of the poem which is
probably as you already know from the title working together. The poem also
touched on the things that we don’t see that can also shape us; I thought this
drew a nice parallel with my synesthesia so I incorporated it into my piece.
Using the different colors outside a human’s
tonal range wasn’t just to show that I can think in a pop art kind of way but
to show how I view people synesthetically. And these colors that make up a person’s
personality and eventually work together to create that person’s
identity within my own head. The background colors can represent anything from
the person’s voice to the colors that they project when I’m around them; it can
be their attitude or emotions. I think that’s
one of my favorite parts of my synesthesia is that it’s very complex but easy
for me to understand since it is coming from my own head after all, I also like
how its intangible and works more in my subconscious so in a way it actually
does greatly shape my likes and dislikes and some of my actions. Also as a side
note I tried to paint this piece in about thirty minutes only because when I usually
paint or draw something I’ll take upwards of seven hours plus total on any
given piece. So it was a nice change to just bump out the meaning rather than
muddle through the painting details. Also ignore the hair i usually spend half my time on a peices hair but tried to speedpaint.
Monday, December 8, 2014
Imagination Decay
I
thought the journal prompt about rather or not your imagination is growing
stronger or continuously weakening as you age. Imagination is hard to quantify
because it’s such an abstract concept that our words can only grasp at its fumes
because words too were meant to solidify the abstract. Different people imagine
in different ways, almost as we all speak the same language but we each have
mastered a different dialect. Someone who puts most of their concentration and
energy towards something such as engineering may have a similar imagination as
someone who puts all their concentration into dance, i think this is because
imagination is just looked at as the approach and someone who thinks
mechanically will approach the same concept as someone who usually approaches
concepts abstractly and depending on the concept one person may be considered
more imaginative than the other. I think imagination is relative to the concept
that is being approached or even created. But I do think imagination can decay
over time or strengthen depending on the person who uses it and how often they
test it. As someone who is constantly imagining different design elements and
figuring out different ways to solidify their own thoughts through art I think
that my imagination is at least a little above average. Imagination shapes our lives
in ways that seem minuet but eventually grow enough in magnitude that our
decisions because of it can’t be ignored, imagination could be the way you try
and escape from a bear, the way you talk to people, or the way you view
yourself, any of those possibilities eventually shape yourself and how people
see you. I think imagination eventually becomes your personality and your
character because it does dictate your thoughts, so I guess you are what you imagine.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)